Razor Shark RTP — Push Gaming

Push GamingRelease year on record: 2019· Ocean / sharks

96.7%

Highest RTP

90.52%

Lowest RTP

3.3%–9.48%

House-edge spread

$618

Cost gap / $10k

See recorded RTP values ↓RTP matched a retained secondary snapshot · checked 16 Jul 2026

Primary recorded RTP

96.7%

92%96.2% database median99.5%

House edge

3.3%

Beats

93%

of 2,410 slots

What is the theoretical RTP of Razor Shark (Push Gaming)?

Razor Shark by Push Gaming has a primary theoretical RTP record of 96.7%. RTP Ledger's legacy value matched a retained snapshot from slot.report on 16 Jul 2026. Because the legacy import's upstream source was not retained, this match does not prove two independent origins. The public link identifies the source database, not a game-specific record. RTP Ledger also holds values from 90.52% to 96.7%; that range does not prove which builds remain current. At 96.7%, the theoretical house edge is 3.30%. RTP Ledger has not measured player returns or established which RTP version any casino runs.

Evidence definitions: methodology · source policy · claim evidence record

What stands out

RTP Ledger records 2 RTP values for this game. Source status appears separately.
The difference between the highest and lowest recorded RTP is 6.18 percentage points.
The game RTP is 0.35 percentage points above the Push Gaming median.
The recorded maximum win ranks in the top 3% of tracked Push Gaming games.

Multiple RTP values recorded.RTP Ledger holds more than one RTP value for Razor Shark by Push Gaming: 96.7% (highest) down to 90.52%. The primary record is 96.7%. The RTP table shows source status per recorded value. We do not claim that the range endpoints are current provider builds or which value any casino runs. Open the in-game paytable to confirm the active RTP.

RTP range explorer

Every recorded RTP value

Each value on record, with theoretical cost and source status. A legacy import is not presented as a provider-published version. Cost is expected loss over the long run — not a session outcome.

Value	Recorded RTP	House edge	Cost / $100	Cost / $1,000	Cost / $10,000	Diff vs best	Source & confidence
Primary record	96.7%	3.3%	$3.3	$33	$330	—	Retained secondary snapshotslot.report · checked 16 Jul 2026
Lowest	90.52%	9.48%	$9.48	$94.8	$948	+$618	Source not yet documentedLegacy import — source not yet documented

House edge = 100% − RTP. Theoretical cost = amount wagered × house edge. “Diff vs best” is the extra expected cost against the highest recorded value.

House edge & cost

What the recorded gap implies

A mathematical comparison of the 96.7% and 90.52% values on record. It does not prove the two entries are otherwise identical builds or currently offered by an operator.

Highest recorded96.7%

$3.3

/ $100

$33

/ $1,000

$330

/ $10,000

Lowest recorded90.52%

$9.48

/ $100

$94.8

/ $1,000

$948

/ $10,000

Over $10,000 wagered, the lower recorded RTP implies about $618 more theoretical house edge than the higher value — a 6.18-point difference. This is long-run arithmetic, not a session forecast.

Key game data

The full record

Every field currently held in our dataset. A dash means we have no value on record; source status is reported separately and we do not guess.

Primary recorded RTP

96.7%

RTP range

90.52–96.7%

House edge

3.3%

Volatility

High

Max win

85,475×

Layout

5×4

Ways to win

20 lines

Hit frequency

—

Released

2019

Theme

Ocean / sharks

Provider

Push Gaming

Beats

93% of slots

Why it matters

Why the RTP value matters

A lower RTP implies a higher long-run house edge. RTP Ledger does not infer a casino's live configuration from a range in the dataset.

RTP Ledger holds more than one RTP value under the Razor Shark record. The recorded RTP values can imply materially different long-run costs. The dataset does not establish whether the game versions are otherwise identical or current. It also does not show which version a casino runs. The in-game rules or paytable are the practical source to check before play.

At 96.7% the theoretical house edge is 3.3%; at 90.52% it is 9.48%. RTP Ledger therefore shows each recorded endpoint with its own source status rather than collapsing the range into one number.

Gameplay

Mechanics on record

Only mechanics present in our dataset are shown. Their source coverage varies; confirm gameplay details in the game's own rules.

Grid & lines

The recorded layout is 5×4 with 20 lines on record. Check the rules for the exact win evaluation.

Volatility

The recorded volatility label is high. It describes the expected distribution of outcomes, not what will happen in one session.

Max win

The top multiplier on record is 85,475× stake. It is a theoretical ceiling, not a typical or expected result.

Bonus features

Features on record

Feature labels currently held in our dataset. Each links to every tracked slot that shares the normalized label.

Free SpinsMystery StacksNudge FeatureRazor Reveal Multiplier

Data status

Where each figure comes from

Per tracked key field: source, confidence, and a checked date only where a qualifying source check is recorded. A secondary-snapshot match does not prove independent upstream origins. Unverified legacy values stay explicitly unverified.

Primary RTP

Retained secondary snapshot· slot.report· checked 16 Jul 2026

Lowest recorded RTP

Source not yet documented

Highest recorded RTP

Source not yet documented

Max win

Retained secondary snapshot· slot.report· checked 16 Jul 2026

Volatility

Retained secondary snapshot· slot.report· checked 16 Jul 2026

How we source this · Source policy · Report an issue

RTP Ledger analysis

Our read on the numbers

At its primary recorded value of 96.7%, Razor Shark sits 0.32 points above the 96.38% average of the 84 Push Gaming titles we track, and it ranks above 93% of the 2,410-slot database. The percentile and provider-average figures compare only values in the recorded dataset; inspect the source status before attribution, especially for the range.

The two recorded endpoints imply a $618 theoretical-cost gap per $10,000 and a6.18-point house-edge difference. The theoretical-cost calculation does not prove that both values represent current provider versions. It also does not show which version a casino runs. Check the source status for each RTP value and confirm the RTP in the paytable before playing.

Analysis — RTP Ledger Data Team · figures updated 11 Jul 2026

Studio benchmark

Razor Shark vs the Push Gaming catalogue

How this title sits inside the 84 Push Gaming slots in our database.

Push Gaming slots

96.35%

Studio median RTP

96.38%

Studio average RTP

Titles with recorded ranges

median

Razor Shark (96.7%) against the Push Gaming median (96.35%). See the full Push Gaming catalogue →

Similar games

If you like this one

Closest matches by feature overlap and RTP — every row links to its own full record.


Mystery MuseumPush Gaming	RTP96.58%	Volatility	Max win17,500×	Push Gaming	2020
Jammin' JarsPush Gaming	RTP96.83%	Volatility	Max win—	Push Gaming	2018
Fat DracPush Gaming	RTP96.57%	Volatility	Max win50,000×	Push Gaming	2021
Razor ReturnsPush Gaming	RTP96.55%	Volatility	Max win100,000×	Push Gaming	2023
Retro SweetsPush Gaming	RTP96.49%	Volatility	Max win10,000×	Push Gaming	2024
Tiki TumblePush Gaming	RTP96.49%	Volatility	Max win18,278×	Push Gaming	2018

Change history

Record changes

This list shows the available source events for the game record. Older history can be incomplete. RTP Ledger does not reconstruct missing events.

16 Jul 2026The legacy RTP value matched a retained secondary-source snapshot; the original import source was not retained.
16 Jul 2026The legacy volatility label matched a retained secondary-source snapshot; the original import source was not retained.
11 Jul 2026Razor Shark's RTP Ledger data record was updated.

AdvertisementSponsored partners

Featured partners. Terms status included.

Available cards are paid placements. Source-linked public terms are identified when documented; an unconfirmed referral value is never presented as an offer. This is not an RTP, safety or payout ranking.

Partners: 3
Offers sourced: 3
Live check: 0

Common questions

What is the RTP of Razor Shark?

RTP Ledger records a primary theoretical RTP of 96.7% for Razor Shark by Push Gaming, plus a recorded range from 90.52% to 96.7%. The source-status section lists the status for each value. Check the in-game paytable to confirm the figure a casino runs.

What does the lower recorded RTP imply?

The recorded range endpoints imply house edges of 9.48% at 90.52% and 3.3% at 96.7%. Over $10,000 wagered that is a difference of about $618 in theoretical cost. The source-status section lists each endpoint. The range alone does not prove which provider builds remain live.

How volatile is Razor Shark?

Push Gaming is recorded as the studio behind Razor Shark, whose volatility field is high. Individual sessions can swing far from the recorded RTP; RTP is a long-run average, not a per-session expectation. Check the source status for the volatility field.

What is the max win in Razor Shark?

RTP Ledger records a top multiplier of 85,475× the stake. The source-status section lists the source for the top multiplier. The recorded multiplier is a theoretical maximum, not a typical or expected outcome.

Play responsibly

RTP is a long-run average, never a guarantee for any session. Slots are entertainment, not income. 18+ only — set a budget you can afford to lose and never chase losses.

Responsible gambling & help lines →

Learn more

Understand the numbers

What is RTP?RTP vs house edge Slot volatility Our methodology Source policy