Cloudbet vs Shuffle: the documented differences
Every difference below traces to a dated source: welcome-offer terms, payment coverage, licence and platform facts. Unknown stays unknown, and nothing is aggregated into a safety score. The full 20-area research record for both casinos follows the comparison.
Welcome offer, documented
Mechanism on record: unknown. The checked source did not establish full offer terms; see the source check
Mechanism on record: unknown. The checked source did not establish full offer terms; see the source check
Decision areas, side by side
The seven areas a depositor checks first, each with its research status and latest dated check. Statuses measure research coverage, never quality, and never combine into a rating.
| Area | Cloudbet | Shuffle |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Documented · 2026-09-27 | Documented · 2026-09-13 |
| Payment routes | Documented · 2026-09-27 | Documented · 2026-09-12 |
| Deposit terms | Partial | Partial |
| Withdrawal terms | Partial · 2026-09-27 | Partial · 2026-09-12 |
| Bonus terms | Partial · 2026-09-26 | Partial · 2026-09-12 |
| KYC / verification | Partial · 2026-09-27 | Partial · 2026-09-12 |
| Cashout observation | Partial | Partial |
What the documented record separates
- Bonus mechanism: Cloudbet's recorded mechanism is not established; the checked source did not establish full terms. Shuffle's recorded mechanism is not established; the checked source did not establish full terms. A player comparing headline bonuses cannot verify either offer from the checked sources today.
- Research depth on RTP Ledger: Cloudbet's record has source-backed claims in 10 of 20 areas. Shuffle's record has source-backed claims in 8 of 20 areas. Where a record is thin, verify directly with the operator before depositing.
Cloudbet
- Research tier
- Source-reviewed record
- Areas with source support
- 10/20
- Source-linked statements
- 18
- First-party test areas
- 0
- Unique sources
- 10
- Latest dated evidence
- 2026-09-27
Shuffle
- Research tier
- Source-reviewed record
- Areas with source support
- 8/20
- Source-linked statements
- 15
- First-party test areas
- 0
- Unique sources
- 7
- Latest dated evidence
- 2026-09-13
Every decision area, including the gaps
A source link supports only the scope stated in its cell. Published rules are not treated as an RTP Ledger account test, and no dated source means the area remains explicitly unresearched.
| Evidence area | Cloudbet | Shuffle |
|---|---|---|
| 01Legal operator identity | Documented· 1 supported statement The terms preamble names Halcyon Super Holdings B.V. as the operator of cloudbet.com. The preamble gives company number 148526 and an address at Boulevard 03. The Curaçao Gaming Authority certificate binds the same company, company number and domain. The privacy policy gives a different postal address for the same company: Boulevard 50. RTP Ledger does not resolve this address discrepancy. Checked 2026-09-27 | Documented· 1 supported statement The terms name Natural Nine B.V. as the owner and operator of shuffle.com. The regulator certificate binds the same company and company number to the domain. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 02Licence and domain coverage | Documented· 1 supported statement The terms cite licence OGL/2024/328/0599. The Curaçao Gaming Authority’s own certificate lookup confirms the same licence number. The certificate lookup shows a grant date of 23/05/2025 and a current status of Active. The CGA’s own bulk licence registry PDF is dated 2026-09-10. The registry PDF lists the same licence number and company. The registry PDF gives a different issued date, 23 November 2025, and a different expiry date, 23 May 2026. The registry PDF gives a different status: "Assessment in progress". RTP Ledger does not resolve this discrepancy between the two CGA-published sources. Checked 2026-09-27 | Documented· 1 supported statement The regulator certificate lists shuffle.com, Natural Nine B.V., licence number OGL/2024/1337/0628 and an active status. The terms cite the same licence number. The Curaçao Gaming Control Board's bulk licence registry PDF, dated 2026-09-10, lists the same licence number, company and company number with the status Indefinite. Checked 2026-09-13 |
| 03Country restrictions | Documented· 1 supported statement Clause 7.1.3 bars a user physically located in 19 named countries or territories from betting or withdrawing funds. The list includes Australia, Austria, Belgium, China (Macau and Hong Kong SAR), Curaçao, Cuba, France, Germany, Iran, Lithuania and Malta. It also includes Myanmar, the Netherlands, North Korea, Singapore, Syria, Spain, the United States of America and its territories, and the United Kingdom. Clause 7.1.3 also bars three named regions in Ukraine: Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. Checked 2026-09-27 | Documented· 1 supported statement Clause 8.3 names 14 prohibited jurisdictions. The list runs from Australia to the United States and includes the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Sweden and the Netherlands. The clause also excludes sanctioned or unlicensable locations. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 04Account journey and closure | Not checked· 0 supported statements Registration, verification stages, account currency and closure journey are not checked. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements Registration, verification stages, account currency and closure journey are not checked. No dated source |
| 05Payment catalogue | Documented· 1 supported statement The crypto transaction fees page lists 30 currencies. Each currency shows one or more accepted networks, for example USDT on Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Avalanche C-Chain, Solana, Polygon, TRON and The Open Network. The page states that Cloudbet charges no deposit fee. It attributes withdrawal fees to the blockchain network and says these fees can change without notice. Withdrawal minimums are listed separately in the table; the text does not attribute those minimums to the network. Checked 2026-09-27 | Documented· 1 supported statement The help-centre article lists every asset accepted for deposits and withdrawals. It names the supported networks for each asset, for example USDT on ERC20, BEP20, TRC20, POL and SOL. Deposits on other networks are not guaranteed to be retrievable. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 06Deposit terms | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement The crypto transaction fees page states a deposit fee of zero for every listed asset. It does not state a deposit minimum, a confirmation-count requirement or a crediting stage for any asset. RTP Ledger found no other page that states the deposit minimum, confirmations or crediting stage. Coverage gaps: deposit.route_terms. No dated source | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement The terms and the supported-assets article name the accepted assets and networks, but they do not state deposit minimums, confirmation requirements or crediting stages. Coverage gaps: deposit.route_terms. No dated source |
| 07Withdrawal terms | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements The crypto transaction fees page states that Cloudbet charges no deposit fee. The page states that the blockchain network sets a flat withdrawal fee. The page states that this fee can change without notice. Clause 7.1.10.1 reserves the right to add a handling charge of up to 5% on deposits and withdrawals. Clause 7.5.8 gives a 24-hour window for a refund request. The window extends to 30 calendar days if the user claims that another person accessed the account. RTP Ledger has not observed a withdrawal on cloudbet.com, so processing time and effective fees are not established. Coverage gaps: first-party withdrawal processing observation. Checked 2026-09-27 | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements Clause 10.2 sets a 100% wagering rule per deposit. Same-wallet, same-network digital-asset withdrawals are exempt. Clauses 10.6 and 10.7 state that the minimum amount and any fee appear in the cashier before confirmation. No fixed figures are published. RTP Ledger has not observed a withdrawal on shuffle.com, so processing time and effective fees are not established. Coverage gaps: first-party withdrawal processing observation. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 08Bonus terms | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements The promotion page checked on 26 September 2026 describes a Cash Vault separately from the $2,500 reload and rakeback amount. Clause 8.4 of the terms retains a $2,500 package cap. The previous total-cap and no-wagering summary is withheld pending reconciliation. The separate stored claim that all slots contribute 100% is also withdrawn: clause 8.5 now defines contribution by RTP. Earlier evidence remains in this claim’s history; this check was limited to the changed bonus sources. Section 8.4 states account eligibility, first-deposit activation, a 30-day period and a $2,500 package cap. The promotion page describes the Cash Vault separately from reloads and casino rakeback. RTP Ledger has not established how the stated cap and expiry apply to the whole current offer, so the earlier combined eligibility-and-expiry claim is withheld. This is a public-source check, not an account test or partner confirmation. Coverage gaps: bonus.economic_terms, bonus.account_eligibility_and_expiry. Checked 2026-09-26 | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement The help-centre article that documented the 100% first-deposit bonus on 2026-08-19 no longer exists, and the bonuses collection lists only weekly, monthly and reload bonuses. RTP Ledger no longer presents the first-deposit offer as documented. Coverage gaps: bonus.economic_terms, bonus.account_eligibility_and_expiry. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 09KYC and source-of-funds process | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements Clause 18.1.5 requires identity verification once cumulative deposits reach or exceed USD 2,200. Clause 18.1.3 names Sumsub as the contracted provider for automated KYC verification. Clause 7.5.7 lets Cloudbet ask for identification, proof of address, a card check and a photo before paying a withdrawal. RTP Ledger has not run a test account on cloudbet.com, so the stage at which verification is requested in practice is not established. Coverage gaps: observed KYC trigger and stage. Checked 2026-09-27 | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements Clause 5.2 of the terms requires an identity check at a threshold and before the first withdrawal. Accepted documents are a passport, a national identity card or a driving licence. The AML policy adds enhanced due diligence with source-of-funds and source-of-wealth documents. It also allows a withdrawal freeze at a risk-based threshold. RTP Ledger has not run a test account on shuffle.com, so the stage at which verification is requested in practice is not established. Coverage gaps: observed KYC trigger and stage. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 10Responsible-gambling controls | Documented· 2 supported statements The responsible-gambling page publishes a deposit limit with daily, weekly (7-day) or monthly (30-day) duration options. A stricter limit takes effect immediately. A less strict limit, or a cancelled limit, takes effect after a 24-hour wait. RTP Ledger found no separate wager limit or net-loss limit tool on the page. The responsible-gambling page offers cooling-off for 24 hours, 7 days, 1 month or 3 months. Betting is disabled during cooling-off. The page offers self-exclusion for 1 year, 3 years, 5 years or a lifetime. The page describes a lifetime exclusion as irreversible. The page names four help organisations: Gamblers Anonymous, GambleAware, Gambling Therapy and Gamtalk. Checked 2026-09-27 | Documented· 2 supported statements Clause 8 of the responsible gambling policy offers limits on the amount wagered or lost within a chosen period, set daily, weekly or monthly. Clause 4 lists self-exclusion periods of 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months or permanent. Clause 9 links BeGambleAware, Gordon Moody, the Responsible Gambling Council and Gamtalk. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 11RTP Ledger cashout test | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a cloudbet.com test account, so cashout speed and fees are not observed. Coverage gaps: cashout.first_party_observation. No dated source | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a shuffle.com test account, so cashout speed and fees are not observed. Coverage gaps: cashout.first_party_observation. No dated source |
| 12Complaint handling | Not checked· 0 supported statements Complaint handling and resolution outcomes are not checked in a dated source record. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements Complaint handling and resolution outcomes are not checked in a dated source record. No dated source |
| 13Ownership and related brands | Not checked· 0 supported statements Parent, sister-brand and material operating relationships are not checked. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements Parent, sister-brand and material operating relationships are not checked. No dated source |
| 14Game catalogue and RTP evidence | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement The fairness and RNG testing page states that RNGs are certified and tested externally before going live. It states that the theoretical RTP for a game appears in that game’s own information or help section. It states that analysis comparing the actual RTP to the theoretical RTP is carried out quarterly. This custom field name does not match the schema’s Stake Engine catalogue field. Cloudbet publishes a certification and review statement instead of a per-game RTP catalogue. Coverage gaps: game_rtp.stake_engine_catalogue_fields. Checked 2026-09-12 | Not checked· 0 supported statements Casino-specific game availability and deployed RTP evidence are not checked. No dated source |
| 15Fairness and verification | Partial evidence· 1 supported statement The provably fair page states that Cloudbet Originals combine a server seed, a client seed and a nonce. It names SHA3-256 as the algorithm that creates the Commitment and the Round Signature. It names SHAKE256 as the algorithm that turns the Round Signature into the outcome stream. The page states a player can reproduce the Commitment and verify a round once the seeds are revealed. Coverage gaps: reproduced account-bet verification. Checked 2026-09-12 | Not checked· 0 supported statements Audit certificates and reproducible provably-fair implementations are not checked. No dated source |
| 16Account and withdrawal security | Not checked· 0 supported statements Two-factor authentication (2FA), recovery and withdrawal-protection controls are not checked. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements Two-factor authentication (2FA), recovery and withdrawal-protection controls are not checked. No dated source |
| 17Support and escalation | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements The homepage footer lists a Help Center, labelled "Find answers easily", and live chat, labelled "Get Support 24/7". Clause 7.1.10.2 of the terms gives support@cloudbet.com as the contact address for reactivating a suspended account. RTP Ledger has not timed a support request on cloudbet.com, so response times are not established. Coverage gaps: timestamped support-response test. Checked 2026-09-12 | Partial evidence· 2 supported statements Clauses 18.1 and 18.2 of the terms route complaints to customer support by email. A complaint the operator cannot resolve can go to the regulator. RTP Ledger has not timed a support request on shuffle.com, so response times are not established. Coverage gaps: timestamped support-response test. Checked 2026-09-12 |
| 18Product and user experience | Not checked· 0 supported statements Product catalogue, devices and observed usability defects are not checked. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements Product catalogue, devices and observed usability defects are not checked. No dated source |
| 19VIP and loyalty mechanics | Not checked· 0 supported statements VIP earning, tiers, expiry and withdrawal interactions are not checked. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements VIP earning, tiers, expiry and withdrawal interactions are not checked. No dated source |
| 20Privacy and data rights | Not checked· 0 supported statements Controller, collection, retention, transfers and deletion paths are not checked. No dated source | Not checked· 0 supported statements Controller, collection, retention, transfers and deletion paths are not checked. No dated source |
What the research coverage shows
On 2026-09-27, Cloudbet has 10 areas with source support. Shuffle has 8. These totals measure current RTP Ledger research coverage. They do not measure casino safety or service quality.
Current cashout rows, derived live from each dossier:
- Cloudbet: partial evidence; 1 source-linked statement; 0 dated sources; no dated check.
- Shuffle: partial evidence; 1 source-linked statement; 0 dated sources; no dated check.
The comparison does not infer a completed account test from operator-published terms or from another evidence area.
For an asset/network view, use the Money Hub. For the complete publication rules, read the casino evidence methodology.
Optional operator links, after the evidence
The Cloudbet and Shuffle operator buttons are sponsored affiliate links. RTP Ledger may earn a commission from them. Commercial status does not change evidence status, research order, or publication rules. Verify current operator terms before you deposit.
bonus300Publisher-supplied campaign code. It does not confirm bonus eligibility or terms.
acesPublisher-supplied campaign code. It does not confirm bonus eligibility or terms.
18+. Gambling involves risk and is not a way to make money. Check local rules, set limits and never gamble money you cannot afford to lose. Get free support at BeGambleAware.org.