Bitstarz casino evidence review
This review covers 20 decision areas for Bitstarz, including identity, payments, KYC, player protection, game math, security and service. It identifies each checked area, dated source, RTP Ledger test and unknown state.
- Dated source records
- 6
- Partial records
- 7
- Still not checked
- 7
Evidence record maintained by: RTP Ledger Casino Review Team
Review the open evidence gaps before visiting the operator
The research record lists the documented evidence and the open questions. Before you send funds, confirm country access, cashier routes, KYC requirements and current terms with the operator.
SPINNERUse this if signup asks for a code.
Other casino partners to compare
Paid alternatives with direct access to their research records. Compare payment routes, restrictions and live terms before choosing.
- Partner records
- 4
- Live links
- 4
Scroll to compare every partner →
Sponsorship never changes RTP records, source status or editorial order.
Open all casino research →Evidence and gaps for player decisions
The record covers 20 areas: access, payments, protection, game math and service. The record separates published claims from RTP Ledger observations. Areas without evidence have an unknown status.
Identity and access
4 / 20Legal operator identity
DocumentedPublished sourceClause 1.2 of the terms names Gareton B.V. as the manager of BitStarz.com. The clause lists Curaçao registration number 160656. A separate homepage disclaimer for Luxembourg names a second company, Firmero Limited, for payments only.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Claim records · 1
bitstarz.operator.legal-entity· Confirmed within scopeField:operator.legal_entityRecorded value: Gareton B.V.; Curaçao registration number 160656; Landhuis Zuikertuin, Zuikertuintjeweg z/n, Willemstad, Curaçao (terms, clause 1.2); a Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer separately names Firmero Limited (Cyprus reg. ΗΕ 449597) as a payments-facing entityClaim summary: Clause 1.2 of the terms names Gareton B.V. as the manager of BitStarz.com. The clause lists Curaçao registration number 160656. A separate homepage disclaimer for Luxembourg names a second company, Firmero Limited, for payments only.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.operator.legal-entity.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Gareton B.V.; Curaçao registration number 160656; Landhuis Zuikertuin, Zuikertuintjeweg z/n, Willemstad, Curaçao (terms, clause 1.2); a Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer separately names Firmero Limited (Cyprus reg. ΗΕ 449597) as a payments-facing entity · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingBitStarz homepage ↗ · Sources for the claim: Luxembourg-facing regulator and secondary-entity disclaimer, Provably Fair Games marketing text, and the site-wide bonus-package title in the page metadata.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Licence and domain coverage
DocumentedPublished sourceClause 1.2 of the terms cites licence OGL/2024/165/0185 for Gareton B.V. The clause names the regulator as the Curaçao Gaming Authority. A Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer cites the same licence number under a different name, the Curaçao Gaming Control Board. RTP Ledger found no regulator certificate page for licence OGL/2024/165/0185. The Curaçao Gaming Control Board's bulk licence registry PDF is dated 2026-09-10. The registry PDF lists licence OGL/2024/165/0185 for Gareton B.V., company number 160656, with the status Indefinite.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-13BitStarz terms and conditions ↗BitStarz homepage ↗Curaçao Gaming Control Board online gaming licence registry (bulk PDF, snapshot 2026-09-10) ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.licence.cga-status· Confirmed within scopeField:licence.cga.statusRecorded value: OGL/2024/165/0185; Gareton B.V.; named "Curaçao Gaming Authority" in the terms (clause 1.2) and "Curaçao Gaming Control Board" in a Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer; no separate regulator certificate page found; listed in the regulator registry PDF of 2026-09-10 with status IndefiniteClaim summary: Clause 1.2 of the terms cites licence OGL/2024/165/0185 for Gareton B.V. The clause names the regulator as the Curaçao Gaming Authority. A Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer cites the same licence number under a different name, the Curaçao Gaming Control Board. RTP Ledger found no regulator certificate page for licence OGL/2024/165/0185. The Curaçao Gaming Control Board's bulk licence registry PDF is dated 2026-09-10. The registry PDF lists licence OGL/2024/165/0185 for Gareton B.V., company number 160656, with the status Indefinite.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-13 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 2
bitstarz.licence.cga-status.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: OGL/2024/165/0185; Gareton B.V.; named "Curaçao Gaming Authority" in the terms (clause 1.2) and "Curaçao Gaming Control Board" in a Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer; no separate regulator certificate page found · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.bitstarz.licence.cga-status.revised.registry-cross-check.2026-09-13Revised record · Changed: 2026-09-13Previous value: OGL/2024/165/0185; Gareton B.V.; named "Curaçao Gaming Authority" in the terms (clause 1.2) and "Curaçao Gaming Control Board" in a Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer; no separate regulator certificate page foundRecorded value: OGL/2024/165/0185; Gareton B.V.; named "Curaçao Gaming Authority" in the terms (clause 1.2) and "Curaçao Gaming Control Board" in a Luxembourg-facing homepage disclaimer; no separate regulator certificate page found; listed in the regulator registry PDF of 2026-09-10 with status Indefinite · Confirmed within scopeReason: Cross-checked the licence against the regulator's bulk registry PDF (snapshot 2026-09-10) on 2026-09-13. The registry row was appended as a source bound to the captured PDF, and the summary was extended. The value now records the registry status as well. The state did not change.
BitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingBitStarz homepage ↗ · Sources for the claim: Luxembourg-facing regulator and secondary-entity disclaimer, Provably Fair Games marketing text, and the site-wide bonus-package title in the page metadata.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingCuraçao Gaming Control Board online gaming licence registry (bulk PDF, snapshot 2026-09-10) ↗ · Sources for the claim: Row 584: licence OGL/2024/165/0185, Gareton B.V. and company number 160656, with status Indefinite.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-13 · Archived source copy: stake.cga-registry.98256828b78c3d8b885820c44aa5c0442d3f1ce1288aa5673923c1ea21ffa9d5 · SHA-256 98256828b78c3d8b885820c44aa5c0442d3f1ce1288aa5673923c1ea21ffa9d5
Country restrictions
DocumentedPublished sourceClause 3.6 of the terms names 66 barred countries, from United States of America to Curacao. An earlier internal record put the count at 73. RTP Ledger did not resolve the difference.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz terms and conditions ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.country.restricted-jurisdictions· Confirmed within scopeField:country.restricted_marketsRecorded value: 66 named countries and territories in clause 3.6 of the terms today, from United States of America to Curacao; an earlier internal note recorded 73Claim summary: Clause 3.6 of the terms names 66 barred countries, from United States of America to Curacao. An earlier internal record put the count at 73. RTP Ledger did not resolve the difference.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.country.restricted-jurisdictions.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: 66 named countries and territories in clause 3.6 of the terms today, from United States of America to Curacao; an earlier internal note recorded 73 · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Account journey and closure
Not checkedNo evidence basisRegistration, verification stages, account currency and closure journey are not checked.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated source
Money movement and verification
5 / 20Payment catalogue
DocumentedPublished sourceThe Payments page lists twelve crypto assets for deposit and withdrawal. USDT deposits work on the Tron, Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain networks. The page does not name a network for the other eleven assets.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public; Asset: listed crypto assets; Network: as listed per asset; Direction: both
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz Payments and Available Currencies page ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.payments.route-catalogue· Confirmed within scopeField:payments.route_catalogueRecorded value: Deposit and withdrawal accepted for BTC, LTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, DOGE, XRP, BCH, USDC, TRX, BNB and ADA; the page's embedded currency configuration lists USDT on the Tron (TRC20), Ethereum (ERC20) and BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) networks; no network is named for the other eleven assetsClaim summary: The Payments page lists twelve crypto assets for deposit and withdrawal. USDT deposits work on the Tron, Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain networks. The page does not name a network for the other eleven assets.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=public; asset=listed crypto assets; network=as listed per asset; direction=bothEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.payments.route-catalogue.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Deposit and withdrawal accepted for BTC, LTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, DOGE, XRP, BCH, USDC, TRX, BNB and ADA; the page's embedded currency configuration lists USDT on the Tron (TRC20), Ethereum (ERC20) and BNB Smart Chain (BEP20) networks; no network is named for the other eleven assets · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz Payments and Available Currencies page ↗ · Sources for the claim: Per-asset deposit and withdrawal fee, speed and limit table, and the embedded currency configuration naming networks and required confirmations.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Deposit terms
DocumentedPublished sourceEach of the twelve crypto assets has its own minimum deposit and a 0% fee. The page shows Instant processing for every asset. An embedded currency configuration lists required confirmations per asset, from 1 to 25. The Instant label does not reflect a 25-confirmation wait for Binance Coin.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public; Asset: listed crypto assets; Network: as listed per asset; Direction: deposit
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz Payments and Available Currencies page ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.deposit.route-terms· Confirmed within scopeField:deposit.route_termsRecorded value: Each of the 12 crypto assets carries its own minimum deposit and a 0% fee shown as "Instantly"; the embedded currency configuration requires 1 confirmation for Bitcoin and Solana, 3 for Ripple, 6 for Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash and Dogecoin, 10 for Ethereum, USDT-ERC20 and USDC, 15 for Cardano, 19 for Tron and USDT-TRC20, and 25 for Binance CoinClaim summary: Each of the twelve crypto assets has its own minimum deposit and a 0% fee. The page shows Instant processing for every asset. An embedded currency configuration lists required confirmations per asset, from 1 to 25. The Instant label does not reflect a 25-confirmation wait for Binance Coin.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=public; asset=listed crypto assets; network=as listed per asset; direction=depositEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.deposit.route-terms.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Each of the 12 crypto assets carries its own minimum deposit and a 0% fee shown as "Instantly"; the embedded currency configuration requires 1 confirmation for Bitcoin and Solana, 3 for Ripple, 6 for Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash and Dogecoin, 10 for Ethereum, USDT-ERC20 and USDC, 15 for Cardano, 19 for Tron and USDT-TRC20, and 25 for Binance Coin · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz Payments and Available Currencies page ↗ · Sources for the claim: Per-asset deposit and withdrawal fee, speed and limit table, and the embedded currency configuration naming networks and required confirmations.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Withdrawal terms
Partial evidencePublished + observed evidenceThe Payments page gives the same fee, speed and limits for twelve crypto assets. Clause 8.7.1 targets payout within 1 hour, but clause 8.7.8 also cites a 10-minute average. BitStarz and its payment processor charge no withdrawal fee under clause 8.7.10. Bank transfer payouts move in EUR within 3 to 10 banking days under clause 8.7.7. RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a BitStarz test account. Processing time and effective fees stay unconfirmed by direct test. Coverage gaps: first-party withdrawal processing observation.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public; Asset: listed crypto assets; Network: as listed per asset; Direction: withdrawal
Claim records · 2
bitstarz.withdrawal.published-rules· Confirmed within scopeField:withdrawal.crypto.published_rulesRecorded value: All 12 crypto assets share a 300 kr minimum, a 500 000 kr maximum, a 0% fee and "Instantly" processing on the Payments page; the terms target payout within 1 hour (8.7.1) but also cite a 10-minute average (8.7.8); no operator withdrawal fee (8.7.10); bank transfer pays out in EUR within 3 to 10 banking days (8.7.7)Claim summary: The Payments page gives the same fee, speed and limits for twelve crypto assets. Clause 8.7.1 targets payout within 1 hour, but clause 8.7.8 also cites a 10-minute average. BitStarz and its payment processor charge no withdrawal fee under clause 8.7.10. Bank transfer payouts move in EUR within 3 to 10 banking days under clause 8.7.7.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=public; asset=listed crypto assets; network=as listed per asset; direction=withdrawalEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.withdrawal.published-rules.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: All 12 crypto assets share a 300 kr minimum, a 500 000 kr maximum, a 0% fee and "Instantly" processing on the Payments page; the terms target payout within 1 hour (8.7.1) but also cite a 10-minute average (8.7.8); no operator withdrawal fee (8.7.10); bank transfer pays out in EUR within 3 to 10 banking days (8.7.7) · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz Payments and Available Currencies page ↗ · Sources for the claim: Per-asset deposit and withdrawal fee, speed and limit table, and the embedded currency configuration naming networks and required confirmations.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingBitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingbitstarz.withdrawal.observed-processing· UnknownField:withdrawal.observed_processingRecorded value: No first-party withdrawal observationClaim summary: RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a BitStarz test account. Processing time and effective fees stay unconfirmed by direct test.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: RTP Ledger research status; no test evidenceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.withdrawal.observed-processing.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: No first-party withdrawal observation · UnknownReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
KYC and source-of-funds process
Partial evidencePublished + observed evidenceThe terms require a government ID, a proof of payment and a proof of address. Clause 7.2.3 caps the proof of address at 90 days old. Clause 8.7.8 lets BitStarz require game-provider checks for a significant win, at its own discretion. No fixed withdrawal threshold is published. RTP Ledger has not run a test account on BitStarz. The verification trigger stage in practice stays unconfirmed. Coverage gaps: observed KYC trigger and stage.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public; Asset: digital assets; Network: as shown in the cashier; Direction: withdrawal
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz terms and conditions ↗Claim records · 2
bitstarz.kyc.withdrawal-and-source-of-funds· Confirmed within scopeField:kyc.withdrawal_and_source_of_fundsRecorded value: Government ID, proof of payment and proof of address (max 90 days old) required per clauses 7.1-7.2.3; clause 8.7.8 lets BitStarz require game-provider verification for a "significant" win at its own discretion, with no fixed threshold publishedClaim summary: The terms require a government ID, a proof of payment and a proof of address. Clause 7.2.3 caps the proof of address at 90 days old. Clause 8.7.8 lets BitStarz require game-provider checks for a significant win, at its own discretion. No fixed withdrawal threshold is published.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=public; asset=digital assets; network=as shown in the cashier; direction=withdrawalEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.kyc.withdrawal-and-source-of-funds.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Government ID, proof of payment and proof of address (max 90 days old) required per clauses 7.1-7.2.3; clause 8.7.8 lets BitStarz require game-provider verification for a "significant" win at its own discretion, with no fixed threshold published · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingbitstarz.kyc.observed-trigger-stage· UnknownField:kyc.observed_trigger_stageRecorded value: No first-party test of the verification trigger stageClaim summary: RTP Ledger has not run a test account on BitStarz. The verification trigger stage in practice stays unconfirmed.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: RTP Ledger research status; no test evidenceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.kyc.observed-trigger-stage.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: No first-party test of the verification trigger stage · UnknownReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
Bonus terms
Partial evidencePublished sourceThe Welcome Package spans the first four deposits and was live today. Page metadata names the package 5 BTC plus 200 free spins. The numbered bonus terms instead describe 180 free spins paid over 8 days. RTP Ledger did not resolve the difference between the two spin counts. The terms set a 40 times wagering requirement and a 7 day expiry. Coverage gaps: bonus.account_eligibility_and_expiry.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz Bonus Terms and Conditions ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.bonus.welcome-package· Confirmed within scopeField:bonus.economic_termsRecorded value: Welcome Package across the first four deposits, live today; page metadata (schema.org WebSite description) states "5 BTC + 200 FS Welcome Package"; the numbered bonus terms instead describe 180 free spins paid over 8 days, a 40x wagering requirement, a 7-day validity window for Welcome Package bonuses, and a capped maximum bet during wageringClaim summary: The Welcome Package spans the first four deposits and was live today. Page metadata names the package 5 BTC plus 200 free spins. The numbered bonus terms instead describe 180 free spins paid over 8 days. RTP Ledger did not resolve the difference between the two spin counts. The terms set a 40 times wagering requirement and a 7 day expiry.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.bonus.welcome-package.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Welcome Package across the first four deposits, live today; page metadata (schema.org WebSite description) states "5 BTC + 200 FS Welcome Package"; the numbered bonus terms instead describe 180 free spins paid over 8 days, a 40x wagering requirement, a 7-day validity window for Welcome Package bonuses, and a capped maximum bet during wagering · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz Bonus Terms and Conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Welcome Package structure, wagering requirement, maximum bet during wagering, and bonus expiry.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Protection, ownership and recourse
4 / 20Responsible-gambling controls
DocumentedPublished sourceBitStarz publishes a Wager Limit and a Loss Limit, both set daily, weekly or monthly. A Deposit Limit tool also exists for fiat currencies. The page states that crypto deposit limits cannot be enforced. A Cooling-Off period runs from 1 day to 6 months, with a 24-hour cancellation delay. A Self-Exclusion period runs from 1 day to several years and locks the account at once. The Play Safe page also offers self-exclusion by contacting support directly. The page links GamCare and GordonHouse directly. A third link, labeled Gam-Anon, points to a Gamblers Anonymous domain rather than the Gam-Anon domain.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz Play Safe page ↗Claim records · 2
bitstarz.responsible-gambling.loss-and-wager-limits· Confirmed within scopeField:responsible_gambling.loss_and_wager_limitsRecorded value: Wager Limit and Loss Limit tools, set daily, weekly or monthly; a Deposit Limit tool exists, but the page states crypto deposit limits cannot be enforced and recommends a wager or loss limit insteadClaim summary: BitStarz publishes a Wager Limit and a Loss Limit, both set daily, weekly or monthly. A Deposit Limit tool also exists for fiat currencies. The page states that crypto deposit limits cannot be enforced.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.responsible-gambling.loss-and-wager-limits.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Wager Limit and Loss Limit tools, set daily, weekly or monthly; a Deposit Limit tool exists, but the page states crypto deposit limits cannot be enforced and recommends a wager or loss limit instead · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz Play Safe page ↗ · Sources for the claim: Wager Limit, Loss Limit, Deposit Limit, Cooling-Off, Self-Exclusion and external help-organisation links.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingbitstarz.responsible-gambling.exclusion-and-break· Confirmed within scopeField:responsible_gambling.exclusion_and_breakRecorded value: Cooling-Off period from 1 day to 6 months with a 24-hour cancellation delay; Self-Exclusion period from 1 day to several years, effective immediately; a separate support-contact self-exclusion route is also published; help links to GamCare and GordonHouse, plus a "Gam-Anon" label pointing to gamblersanonymous.org rather than gam-anon.orgClaim summary: A Cooling-Off period runs from 1 day to 6 months, with a 24-hour cancellation delay. A Self-Exclusion period runs from 1 day to several years and locks the account at once. The Play Safe page also offers self-exclusion by contacting support directly. The page links GamCare and GordonHouse directly. A third link, labeled Gam-Anon, points to a Gamblers Anonymous domain rather than the Gam-Anon domain.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.responsible-gambling.exclusion-and-break.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Cooling-Off period from 1 day to 6 months with a 24-hour cancellation delay; Self-Exclusion period from 1 day to several years, effective immediately; a separate support-contact self-exclusion route is also published; help links to GamCare and GordonHouse, plus a "Gam-Anon" label pointing to gamblersanonymous.org rather than gam-anon.org · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz Play Safe page ↗ · Sources for the claim: Wager Limit, Loss Limit, Deposit Limit, Cooling-Off, Self-Exclusion and external help-organisation links.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
RTP Ledger cashout test
Partial evidenceRTP Ledger research status; no test evidenceRTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a BitStarz test account. Cashout speed and fees stay unobserved. Coverage gaps: cashout.first_party_observation.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
No dated sourceClaim records · 1
bitstarz.cashout.first-party-observation· UnknownField:cashout.first_party_observationRecorded value: No first-party cashout observationClaim summary: RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a BitStarz test account. Cashout speed and fees stay unobserved.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: RTP Ledger research status; no test evidenceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.cashout.first-party-observation.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: No first-party cashout observation · UnknownReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
Complaint handling
Not checkedNo evidence basisComplaint handling and resolution outcomes are not checked in a dated source record.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated sourceOwnership and related brands
Not checkedNo evidence basisParent, sister-brand and material operating relationships are not checked.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated source
Game math, fairness and security
3 / 20Game catalogue and RTP evidence
Partial evidencePublished sourceClause 4.1 puts the duty on the player to check each game payout percentage. BitStarz does not publish RTP figures site-wide on the pages checked. Coverage gaps: game_rtp.stake_engine_catalogue_fields.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz terms and conditions ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.game-rtp.payout-percentage-disclosure· Confirmed within scopeField:game_rtp.payout_percentage_disclosureRecorded value: Clause 4.1 places the duty on the player to check each game's theoretical payout percentage; no RTP figures are published site-wide on the pages checkedClaim summary: Clause 4.1 puts the duty on the player to check each game payout percentage. BitStarz does not publish RTP figures site-wide on the pages checked.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.game-rtp.payout-percentage-disclosure.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Clause 4.1 places the duty on the player to check each game's theoretical payout percentage; no RTP figures are published site-wide on the pages checked · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Fairness and verification
Partial evidencePublished sourceThe homepage markets Provably Fair Games as a way to verify round outcomes. The page gives no seed, hash or algorithm detail behind the claim. Coverage gaps: fairness.published_algorithm, reproduced account-bet verification.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz homepage ↗Claim records · 1
bitstarz.fairness.provably-fair-marketing· Confirmed within scopeField:fairness.marketing_claimRecorded value: Homepage markets "Provably Fair Games" as a way to verify round outcomes; no seed, hash or algorithm detail is given on the pageClaim summary: The homepage markets Provably Fair Games as a way to verify round outcomes. The page gives no seed, hash or algorithm detail behind the claim.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.fairness.provably-fair-marketing.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Homepage markets "Provably Fair Games" as a way to verify round outcomes; no seed, hash or algorithm detail is given on the page · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz homepage ↗ · Sources for the claim: Luxembourg-facing regulator and secondary-entity disclaimer, Provably Fair Games marketing text, and the site-wide bonus-package title in the page metadata.Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pending
Account and withdrawal security
Not checkedNo evidence basisTwo-factor authentication (2FA), recovery and withdrawal-protection controls are not checked.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated source
Service, product and policy
4 / 20Support and escalation
Partial evidencePublished + observed evidenceClause 12.2 offers live chat and email support. The clause states both channels run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The separate help-centre subdomain returned HTTP 403 to an automated fetch today. RTP Ledger has not timed a support request on BitStarz. Response times stay unconfirmed by direct test. Coverage gaps: timestamped support-response test.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public
Checked 2026-09-12BitStarz terms and conditions ↗Claim records · 2
bitstarz.support.published-channels· Confirmed within scopeField:support.published_channelsRecorded value: Live chat and email, published as available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (clause 12.2); the separate help-centre subdomain returned HTTP 403 to an automated fetch todayClaim summary: Clause 12.2 offers live chat and email support. The clause states both channels run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The separate help-centre subdomain returned HTTP 403 to an automated fetch today.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: Published sourceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.support.published-channels.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: Live chat and email, published as available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (clause 12.2); the separate help-centre subdomain returned HTTP 403 to an automated fetch today · Confirmed within scopeReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
BitStarz terms and conditions ↗ · Sources for the claim: Operator identity and licence (clause 1.2), restricted-countries list (3.6), payout-percentage disclosure (4.1), KYC procedure and documents (7.1-7.2.3), withdrawal rules and fees (8.7.1-8.7.10) and support channels (12.2).Source access status: reachable · 2026-09-12 · Archived source copy pendingbitstarz.support.first-party-response-test· UnknownField:support.first_party_response_testRecorded value: No first-party support response testClaim summary: RTP Ledger has not timed a support request on BitStarz. Response times stay unconfirmed by direct test.What the claim covers: domain=bitstarz.com; account=publicEvidence basis: RTP Ledger research status; no test evidenceChecked: 2026-09-12 · Next review: 2026-12-11Record owner:desk:casino-reviewsIndependent review pendingRecorded change history · 1
bitstarz.support.first-party-response-test.created.2026-09-12Initial record · Changed: 2026-09-12Recorded value: No first-party support response test · UnknownReason: Initial claim record created from the dated source review.
Product and user experience
Not checkedNo evidence basisProduct catalogue, devices and observed usability defects are not checked.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated sourceVIP and loyalty mechanics
Not checkedNo evidence basisVIP earning, tiers, expiry and withdrawal interactions are not checked.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated sourcePrivacy and data rights
Not checkedNo evidence basisController, collection, retention, transfers and deletion paths are not checked.
Scope: No sourced claim is published for this area.
No dated source
What the current record supports
The research record contains 6 documented areas, 7 partial areas and 7 unchecked areas. The counts describe research coverage only.
Dated source records
- Legal operator identity
- Licence claim
- Country restrictions
- Published payment records
- Deposit terms
- Responsible-gambling controls
Partial records
- Withdrawal terms
- Bonus terms
- KYC and source-of-funds process
- RTP Ledger cashout test
- Game and RTP evidence
- Fairness verification
- Support and escalation
Still not checked
- Account journey and closure
- Complaint handling
- Ownership and related brands
- Account security
- Product and user experience
- VIP and loyalty mechanics
- Privacy and data rights
What to check before visiting the operator
The record still needs more evidence or editorial review. The highest-priority open area is Withdrawal terms. The RTP Ledger cashout-test status is RTP Ledger cashout test: Partial records. Published terms do not confirm a completed payout.
The Payments page gives the same fee, speed and limits for twelve crypto assets. Clause 8.7.1 targets payout within 1 hour, but clause 8.7.8 also cites a 10-minute average. BitStarz and its payment processor charge no withdrawal fee under clause 8.7.10. Bank transfer payouts move in EUR within 3 to 10 banking days under clause 8.7.7. RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a BitStarz test account. Processing time and effective fees stay unconfirmed by direct test. Coverage gaps: first-party withdrawal processing observation.
Scope: Domain: bitstarz.com; Account scope: public; Asset: listed crypto assets; Network: as listed per asset; Direction: withdrawal · Checked 2026-09-12 · 2 linked sources
RTP Ledger has not withdrawn funds from a BitStarz test account. Cashout speed and fees stay unobserved. Coverage gaps: cashout.first_party_observation.
Use this page as a research checklist. The current record cannot support a decision based on RTP Ledger-tested deposits, withdrawals or support. Compare other casino research records and payment routes for the exact asset and network before making a decision.
sourced research record · 17 source-linked claims · 12/20 areas with a supported claim
Open the Money Route Finder after reviewing these evidence gaps →Questions and answers
What has RTP Ledger checked about Bitstarz?
The research record covers 20 areas: 6 documented, 7 partial and 7 unchecked. Each area shows its status, scope, date and linked source. The counts describe research coverage.
Who operates Bitstarz, and can I open an account?
Legal identity: documented. Licence: documented. Country restrictions: documented. Registration and closure: not checked. A licence name does not confirm domain or country coverage.
What is known about Bitstarz deposits, withdrawals, KYC and bonuses?
Payment catalogue: documented. Deposit terms: documented. Withdrawal terms: partially documented. KYC and source of funds: partially documented. Bonus terms: partially documented. A listed asset alone does not prove network, direction, limit or availability for your account.
How does Bitstarz protect players, and what happens when something goes wrong?
Responsible-gambling controls: documented. RTP Ledger cashout test: partially documented. Complaint handling: not checked. Ownership links: not checked. A pending test has an unknown status.
Has RTP Ledger checked Bitstarz games, RTP and fairness?
Game and RTP evidence: partially documented. Reproducible fairness: partially documented. Account and withdrawal security: not checked. Provider or catalogue data alone does not prove the configuration available in your account.
What is known about Bitstarz support, product, VIP and privacy?
Support and escalation: partially documented. Product and user experience: not checked. VIP and loyalty: not checked. Privacy and data rights: not checked. Published availability and observed performance remain separate.
This review uses a shared method with 20 evidence areas. Each status describes research coverage within a stated scope. Affiliate status cannot change the evidence or its status. Read the complete methodology.
See how RTP Ledger selects sourcesReport a data issue
This page may earn a commission from a marked operator link. Evidence order and research states are independent of that relationship.
18+ · Terms apply · Play responsibly — BeGambleAware.org